The legal challenge is led by Attorneys General from Georgia and South Carolina, while 15 other states including Attorneys General from Texas, Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia have joined in the legal move.
South Carolina – Along with colleagues from 15 other states, Attorneys General Chris Carr of Georgia and Alan Wilson of South Carolina are leading an important legal challenge to a recent change to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Initiated by the Biden administration last year, this legislation gives transgender people protections and labels gender dysphoria as a disability.
Considered the pillar of disability rights law, Section 504 forbids any company or group getting government money from discriminating against “qualified individuals with disabilities.” Originally approved in 1973, the legislation was not really enforced until four years later following a famous 25-day sit-in at a federal building in San Francisco.
Rerouting funds
The states’ legal action focuses on a particular provision under these revisions, which they contend could possibly reroute funds required by people with disabilities including autism, dyslexia, and Down Syndrome.
“Our lawsuit is about one thing – fighting the Biden-Harris administration’s obsession with promoting a radical, progressive transgender ideology at every turn. Georgians shouldn’t have their tax dollars go towards treating ‘transgender dysphoria’ as a disability, and we refuse to stand by while children with Down Syndrome, Dyslexia, and Autism are sacrificed at the altar of wokism,” Carr’s office said.
Just a start of something bigger
For many advocacy groups and people with disabilities, this stance caused significant discussion and concern. Many fear that the action would cause more general weakening of the Section 504 protections.
Kim Gibson, executive director of the nonprofit organization disABILITY Link, said, “Basically, (Section 504 says) ‘you matter enough that we should provide equal access to different things.’ Not special. We’re not asking for special treatment as a person with a disability. We’re just asking for equal access.”
Read also: Gas prices expected to go up very soon despite recent price drops
What’s behind the revisions
The rule’s revisions were meant to direct federal agencies in applying Section 504’s necessary accommodations, thereby guaranteeing equal access to education and other rights for transgender people experiencing gender dysphoria. The complaint, however, argues this growth is illegal and reduces the funds earmarked for other students with impairments.
One obvious advantage of Section 504 mentioned by supporters like New Disabled South’s CEO, Dom Kelly, is required adjustments in educational environments for children with disabilities including physical treatment and smart class schedules to improve mobility and access. Kelly said her 504 plan was essential and gave her the same educational possibilities as her friends.
Asserting that it limits states’ autonomy in choosing to accept federal funds linked to these restrictions, the lawsuit also challenges Section 504 on the grounds of “violating principles of clear notice, relatedness, and anti-coercion.” This part of the lawsuit has caused concerns about a potential decrease in federal financing for important accessible services in hospitals, colleges, and other institutions.
Read also: Corporate handout or legal reform? The law that’s splitting South Carolina in two!
Funding remains in the focus
Especially for hospitals, which have to keep accessible facilities to get federal help, Devon Ormond of the Georgia Advocacy Office emphasizes the wider influence of federal financing compliance with Section 504. Centers like disABILITY LINK, in the meantime, mostly rely on this kind of money to offer required services.
Gibson emphasizes the need of keeping a society that provides equality, access, and dignity for all, therefore the possible retreat of these rights could be disastrous for the disabled population.
The debate over Section 504 and its ramifications continues to be vital as the legal procedures go on and with a recent joint status report asking a stop for monthly reports. Emphasizing the historical fight to gain rights under legislation like the ADA and Section 504, advocates are pushing disabled people to tell their stories and the value of these protections.
Read also: Trump admin’s federal cuts directly affect Black students in South Carolina
The lawsuit emphasizes the difficulties in managing new legal interpretations with the resources and protections usually meant for supporting other vulnerable groups.
