South Carolina – Around the time when Trump returned to the White House office earlier this year, Congressman Andy Ogles from Tennessee introduced a House Joint Resolution to amend the Constitution of the United States to allow a President to be elected for up to but no more than three terms.
Following that, South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham sparked considerable debate online after sharing a social media post openly supporting President Donald Trump, even hinting at a potential third term in 2028.
Now President Trump himself said that he might consider third term, one way or another.
The South Carolina Democratic Party (SCDP) has expressed worry in a surprisingly strong reaction to President Donald Trump’s latest comments implying he would run for a third term in office. This reaction follows President Trump’s forceful declaration during an NBC News interview with Kristen Welker on Sunday that he was serious about looking into ways to prolong his administration beyond the constitutionally mandated two terms.
The Chair of the SCDP, Christale Spain, expressed the party’s concern by calling Trump’s remarks a “dangerous threat to our democracy.” A safeguard codified by the 22nd Amendment after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency, the United States Constitution clearly limits a president to serving only two terms.
Reflecting a fundamental American attitude against monarchical authority, Spain’s declaration emphasized the importance of this constitutional restriction meant to stop any kind of authoritarian control.
Spain further emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating, “Trump’s comments are not just reckless—they’re a direct assault on our Democracy. Americans decided over 200 years ago that we did not want a king and that we will never bend the knee to Donald Trump or any Tyrant.”
This feeling reflects historical concerns about uncontrolled power, especially in South Carolina, a state that is deeply rooted in its battles against centralized overreach.
The SCDP’s statement also underlined a more general concern about Trump’s ongoing drive of what it sees as an extremist and anti-democratic agenda. It urges responsibility, especially from South Carolina Republican leaders, who were asked to publicly state whether they back what the SCDP views as Trump’s unconstitutional aspirations.
“Our democracy is on the line, and South Carolina voters deserve to know where their leaders stand,” Spain added, indicating the potential political consequences of silence or support from local Republican figures.
Read also: Trump admin doesn’t care about Americans’ health as new federal spending cuts raise serious concerns
President Trump, for his part, kept the gravity of his suggestion throughout the interview in spite of the obvious constitutional ban. Citing what he said were unmatched poll results, he even implied that his popularity would cause Americans to back a third term.
But, empirical data from Gallup shows that Trump’s approval ratings have never come close to the historical highs he cited. For example, President George W. Bush got a 90% approval rating in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, a sharp contrast to Trump’s highest approval rating of 47% during his second term.
Trump has raised the topic of prolonging his term before. He has said similar things before, occasionally in jest, such as during a House Republican retreat in January when he jokingly asked, “Am I allowed to run again?”
But the ongoing subject of these comments and the setting in which they are currently being made raised concerns about their consequences for democratic values and the rule of law.
The South Carolina Democratic Party, committing to protect democratic institutions against any kind of erosion and to hold responsible those who would try to subvert them, remains resolute in defense of constitutional limits as the crisis develops. The controversy surrounding Trump’s third-term ambitions is more than a constitutional one; it is a turning point for American democracy and its fundamental value of democratic government under the rule of law.
