Florida – The outbreak of the Iran war and President Trump’s firing of Attorney General Pam Bondi have marked a difficult stretch for the White House, intensifying political pressure just months before the midterm elections.
Bondi was ousted in early April amid reported frustration over her performance, while the conflict in Iran has become a growing liability for Republicans.
The turmoil comes as Americans face rising gas prices, more expensive groceries and deepening frustration over the direction of the country.
Read also: Prominent Democrat warns that Trump’s decline is ‘getting worse’, says he needs ‘child psychologist’
With Democrats tying the administration’s foreign policy decisions to household costs, Trump enters the midterm season confronting economic anxiety, party unease and a widening sense of public disappointment.
A fresh clash over the Justice Department’s handling of fired FBI personnel is now unfolding on Capitol Hill, where Rep. Jamie Raskin is accusing Trump administration officials of steering taxpayer money toward former agents he described as politically favored but professionally “disgraced.”
Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, laid out the allegations in a Tuesday letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche who replaced Pam Bondi.
Read also: “Lie, lie, lie, and lie again”: Trump blasts Fox News, Democrat lawmakers, in savage weekend rant
Rep. Raskin is now sharply questioning why the Department of Justice allegedly directed the FBI to restore employment and deliver large payments to nearly a dozen agents who had faced serious internal findings.
The House Judiciary Democrats’ public letter page lists the May 12, 2026 letter as concerning “Millions of Taxpayer Dollars Directed to FBI Agents Fired.”
“It has come to our attention that you have used your office to improperly shower government cash on Donald Trump’s political operatives and sycophants,” Raskin wrote, framing the matter as more than a personnel dispute.
In his telling, the settlements represent a political reward system inside the department, one that bypassed ordinary accountability and placed public money behind people accused of misconduct.
Read also: Tucker Carlson compares Trump and Gov. Newsom: “Trump is incompetent. Newsom is not incompetent”
According to Raskin’s seven-page letter, the DOJ Office of the Deputy Attorney General ordered the FBI to pay “millions of dollars” to agents accused of criminal conduct, serious security violations and other breaches of trust.
One agent, Raskin said, had his security clearance suspended and later revoked because he had been present in a restricted area of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
“The agent provided false and misleading information to investigators,” Raskin wrote.
“Despite this damning evidence, DOJ Office of the Deputy Attorney General agreed to make a lump sum payment of $63,500 to him and backpay amounting to hundreds of thousands of additional dollars.”
Raskin also singled out former FBI special agent Steven Friend, alleging that he was brought back despite serious findings tied to his conduct. The Maryland Democrat wrote that Friend had illegally recorded FBI conversations, downloaded classified FBI documents and participated in “unsanctioned media interviews with Russian state media outlets.”
Even so, Raskin said, the same DOJ office instructed the FBI to pay Friend more than $61,000, along with “hundreds of thousands of dollars in back pay.”
Another case cited in the letter involved an FBI agent who, according to Raskin, refused to take part in an investigation of Patriot Front, a violent white nationalist group, and procured prostitutes while on assignment. Raskin’s complaint argues that such cases raise a blunt question: whether discipline inside federal law enforcement is being reversed not because the facts changed, but because the politics did.
The letter also turns attention to Vance Day, identified by Raskin as the DOJ official involved in negotiating the payments.
Raskin described Day as known for “hanging up a picture of Adolf Hitler in his chambers” and for “refusing to marry same-sex couples as an Oregon state court judge.” Those details, included in the letter, were used by Raskin to suggest the process was shaped by ideological allies rather than neutral review.
Raskin further alleged that senior staffers for Sen. Chuck Grassley explicitly pushed DOJ to issue the payments. He accused Grassley and officials inside the Deputy Attorney General’s office of operating like a “merry band of looters,” a phrase that quickly became the sharpest line in the dispute.
Grassley’s office rejected the accusation and cast the settlements in a very different light.
In comments to Politico, spokesperson Clare Slattery said, “This seven-page screed is a disgusting and defamatory attempt to smear legitimate whistleblowers while protecting their Biden administration retaliators.” S
“Senator Grassley stands by his efforts to defend and protect all whistleblowers,” she added.
The fight now sits at the intersection of whistleblower protection, FBI discipline, Jan. 6 fallout and partisan oversight of the Justice Department. Raskin is portraying the payments as political favoritism wrapped in government process. Grassley’s side says the same cases involve whistleblowers who were punished and later vindicated.
What remains unresolved is whether the payouts were lawful corrections for retaliation or a taxpayer-funded rescue operation for Trump-aligned figures. Raskin’s letter makes clear that House Democrats intend to keep pressing for answers, especially on who approved the payments, who influenced them and why agents accused of major misconduct were placed back on the federal payroll.
